Comparative mythology corpus

batch.motif.greek-plato-symposium-jowett-gutenberg-l835-l921

batch.motif.greek-plato-symposium-jowett-gutenberg-l835-l921

---
record_id: batch.motif.greek-plato-symposium-jowett-gutenberg-l835-l921
source_text_path: texts/public-domain/greek/project-gutenberg/symposium-jowett.md
passage_locator:
  label: Symposium / SYMPOSIUM / INTRODUCTION.; lines 835-921
  start: '835'
  end: '921'
  translation: Symposium
  notes: Generated from OpenAI Batch run motif-extraction-2026-04-28-high-priority;
    human review required.
canonical_text:
  quote: ''
  summary: The passage is Jowett's introductory commentary on Plato and Greek attitudes
    toward love, indecency, literature, scandal, ethics, education, and social customs.
    It contrasts literary representation with social morals, reflects on good and
    evil coexisting in human nature, warns against unprovable accusations, distinguishes
    Greek and Christian ethics, and discusses elder-youth attachments, salutations,
    and later comparative examples.
  language: English
  quote_policy: summarized
literal_observations:
- id: obs:1
  text: The commentator states that Plato's authority is difficult to use either for
    or against certain practices because his treatment can mix jest and seriousness.
  category: speech
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:1
- id: obs:2
  text: The passage distinguishes between Greek literary genres, saying indecency
    appears in old Greek Comedy but that much preserved Greek literature is free from
    it.
  category: relationship
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:1
- id: obs:3
  text: The passage says good and evil are linked in human nature and may exist side
    by side in the world and in a person.
  category: attribute
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:2
- id: obs:4
  text: The passage uses the image of things growing together until harvest to describe
    the difficulty of separating good and evil.
  category: object
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:2
- id: obs:5
  text: The passage warns that accusations of secret wickedness can be started easily
    and may arise from jealousy or party enmity.
  category: action
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:3
- id: obs:6
  text: The passage lists several Greek public figures as examples of leading men
    against whom accusations were brought.
  category: relationship
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:3
- id: obs:7
  text: The passage states that there is a great gulf between Greek and Christian
    ethics while also urging justice toward the Greeks.
  category: relationship
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:4
- id: obs:8
  text: The passage states that at Thebes and Lacedemon an elder friend's attachment
    to a beloved youth was often treated as part of the youth's education and encouraged
    by parents, unless it degenerated into licentiousness.
  category: relationship
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:5
- id: obs:9
  text: The passage says a hearty kiss or embrace by a male friend returning from
    the army at Potidaea should not automatically be suspected of evil.
  category: action
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:5
- id: obs:10
  text: The passage concludes that an honourable connection of this kind seems to
    have ended with Greek civilization and says there is no noble or virtuous form
    of it among Romans, Celts, or Persians.
  category: relationship
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:5
figures:
- id: fig:1
  name_or_label: Plato
  description: Philosopher whose authority and writings are discussed in relation
    to love, custom, and ethics.
  role_refs:
  - role:1
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:1
  - ev:2
- id: fig:2
  name_or_label: Greek Comic poets
  description: Poets said to ridicule and condemn effeminate love, with indecency
    functioning as a ludicrous element in old Greek Comedy.
  role_refs:
  - role:2
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:1
- id: fig:3
  name_or_label: Greek literary writers
  description: The passage refers collectively to Homer, tragedians, philosophers,
    and other preserved major writers of Hellas as largely free from indecency.
  role_refs:
  - role:3
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:1
- id: fig:4
  name_or_label: Accused leading men of Hellas
  description: Cimon, Alcibiades, Critias, Demosthenes, and Epaminondas are named
    as leading men against whom such accusations were brought.
  role_refs:
  - role:4
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:3
- id: fig:5
  name_or_label: Elder friend
  description: A male elder friend whose attachment to a beloved youth at Thebes and
    Lacedemon is described as part of education when honourable.
  role_refs:
  - role:5
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:5
- id: fig:6
  name_or_label: Beloved youth
  description: A youth whose attachment to an elder friend is described as educational
    in Theban and Lacedemonian custom.
  role_refs:
  - role:6
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:5
- id: fig:7
  name_or_label: Parents
  description: Parents are said to have encouraged the elder-youth attachment when
    it served education and did not become licentious.
  role_refs:
  - role:7
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:5
- id: fig:8
  name_or_label: Epaminondas, Asophychus, and Cephisodorus
  description: Named as an example of a tie in which Asophychus and Cephisodorus were
    united with Epaminondas and fell in his companionship.
  role_refs:
  - role:8
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:5
roles:
- id: role:1
  label: philosophical authority under interpretation
  assigned_to:
  - fig:1
  basis: The passage discusses the difficulty of using Plato as an authority on the
    practices in question.
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:1
- id: role:2
  label: comic critics and ridiculers
  assigned_to:
  - fig:2
  basis: The passage says Comic poets both condemned and ridiculed the subject matter.
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:1
- id: role:3
  label: literary witnesses
  assigned_to:
  - fig:3
  basis: The passage surveys preserved Greek writers as evidence for or against indecency
    in literature.
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:1
- id: role:4
  label: targets of accusation
  assigned_to:
  - fig:4
  basis: The listed men are named as leading figures against whom accusations were
    brought.
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:3
- id: role:5
  label: educational elder companion
  assigned_to:
  - fig:5
  basis: The passage says the elder friend's attachment could be deemed part of a
    youth's education.
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:5
- id: role:6
  label: younger beloved in educational bond
  assigned_to:
  - fig:6
  basis: The youth is described as the beloved youth in an attachment framed as education.
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:5
- id: role:7
  label: social approvers
  assigned_to:
  - fig:7
  basis: Parents are said to have encouraged the attachment under certain conditions.
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:5
- id: role:8
  label: example companions
  assigned_to:
  - fig:8
  basis: The passage presents these named figures as an example of the tie under discussion.
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:5
symbols:
- id: sym:1
  label: harvest image
  literal_form: things growing together until harvest
  associated_figures: []
  taxonomy_refs: []
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:2
- id: sym:2
  label: ethical gulf
  literal_form: a great gulf fixed between Greek and Christian Ethics
  associated_figures: []
  taxonomy_refs: []
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:4
- id: sym:3
  label: kiss or embrace
  literal_form: hearty kiss or embrace of a male friend returning from the army at
    Potidaea
  associated_figures:
  - fig:5
  taxonomy_refs: []
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:5
scenes:
- id: scene:1
  label: Assessment of Greek literature and Plato
  summary: The commentator weighs Plato and Greek literary genres as evidence for
    social customs and argues that literature alone does not prove general moral corruption.
  figure_refs:
  - fig:1
  - fig:2
  - fig:3
  symbol_refs: []
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:1
- id: scene:2
  label: Reflection on mixed good and evil
  summary: The commentator states that good and evil coexist in human nature and uses
    the harvest image to explain why they cannot easily be separated.
  figure_refs: []
  symbol_refs:
  - sym:1
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:2
- id: scene:3
  label: Warning about scandal and accusation
  summary: The commentator says secret accusations may be unprovable and may transform
    innocent friendship into a charge of another kind.
  figure_refs:
  - fig:4
  symbol_refs: []
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:3
- id: scene:4
  label: Greek and Christian ethical contrast
  summary: The commentator contrasts Greek and Christian ethics while cautioning against
    treating Greek outspokenness as proof of greater social corruption.
  figure_refs: []
  symbol_refs:
  - sym:2
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:4
- id: scene:5
  label: Educational attachment and salutation customs
  summary: The commentator describes Theban and Lacedemonian elder-youth attachment
    as educational when honourable, mentions named companions of Epaminondas, and
    discusses male kiss or embrace as a custom not automatically suspect.
  figure_refs:
  - fig:5
  - fig:6
  - fig:7
  - fig:8
  symbol_refs:
  - sym:3
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:5
candidate_motifs:
- id: motif:1
  label: coexistence of good and evil
  taxonomy_refs:
  - duality
  basis: The passage explicitly states that good and evil are linked in human nature
    and exist side by side, reinforced by the harvest image.
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:2
  confidence: high
  cautions: This is ethical commentary rather than mythic narrative; the taxonomy
    reference is thematic rather than a named mythic episode.
- id: motif:2
  label: education through elder-youth bond
  taxonomy_refs:
  - initiation
  - wisdom
  basis: The passage describes an elder friend's attachment to a beloved youth as
    part of education in Thebes and Lacedemon, with parental encouragement under honourable
    conditions.
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:5
  confidence: medium
  cautions: The passage discusses social custom, not a ritual initiation narrative;
    the motif assignment should be reviewed.
- id: motif:3
  label: public accusation transforming friendship
  taxonomy_refs: []
  basis: The passage describes scandal or party enmity converting innocent friendship
    of a great man and a noble youth into an accusation of another connection.
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:3
  confidence: medium
  cautions: No available taxonomy reference clearly matches this pattern.
comparison_claims:
- id: claim:1
  claim: The passage itself contrasts Greek and Christian ethics and cautions that
    Greek outspokenness about hidden matters should not be read directly as proof
    of greater moral corruption.
  claim_level: same_function
  target: Greek ethics compared with Christian ethics
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:4
  counter_evidence_refs: []
  confidence: medium
  limitations: This is a translator's ethical comparison, not an internal mythological
    comparison.
- id: claim:2
  claim: The passage compares modes of salutation among Greeks, the commentator's
    own society, and continental nations, using the kiss or embrace as a social custom
    that can have different meanings across cultures.
  claim_level: same_function
  target: Greek, contemporary English, and continental salutation customs
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:5
  counter_evidence_refs: []
  confidence: medium
  limitations: The comparison concerns social custom rather than mythic symbolism.
evidence:
- id: ev:1
  type: summary
  locator: lines 835-856
  quote_or_summary: The passage says Plato is hard to use as an authority on such
    customs; it surveys Greek literature, saying old Comedy used indecency for laughter
    while much preserved Greek literature is free from indecency.
  source_text_path: texts/public-domain/greek/project-gutenberg/symposium-jowett.md
  rights_note: Public domain source; summarized.
- id: ev:2
  type: quote
  locator: lines 858-869
  quote_or_summary: '"good and evil are linked together in human nature" and, in the
    parable, "they grow together unto the harvest."'
  source_text_path: texts/public-domain/greek/project-gutenberg/symposium-jowett.md
  rights_note: Public domain source; short quotation.
- id: ev:3
  type: summary
  locator: lines 869-886
  quote_or_summary: The passage discusses the difficulty of judging evils by name,
    the ease of imputing secret wickedness, and examples of Greek and Roman public
    figures attacked by such accusations.
  source_text_path: texts/public-domain/greek/project-gutenberg/symposium-jowett.md
  rights_note: Public domain source; summarized.
- id: ev:4
  type: summary
  locator: lines 886-899
  quote_or_summary: The passage states that a great gulf exists between Greek and
    Christian ethics, while Greek outspokenness about hidden matters should not be
    taken as a measure of offence or social corruption.
  source_text_path: texts/public-domain/greek/project-gutenberg/symposium-jowett.md
  rights_note: Public domain source; summarized.
- id: ev:5
  type: summary
  locator: lines 900-921
  quote_or_summary: The passage describes Theban and Lacedemonian elder-youth attachment
    as educational when not licentious, mentions Epaminondas and companions, discusses
    kiss or embrace as salutation custom, and compares later Romans, Celts, and Persians.
  source_text_path: texts/public-domain/greek/project-gutenberg/symposium-jowett.md
  rights_note: Public domain source; summarized.
confidence:
  extraction: high
  motif_candidates: medium
  comparison_claims: medium
  notes: The passage is prose commentary in Jowett's introduction, not a myth narrative.
    Literal extraction is strong; motif labels are thematic and require human review.
reviewer_status:
  status: needs_review
  reviewer: ''
  reviewed_at: ''
  notes: Machine-generated draft from OpenAI Batch; not human-reviewed.
extracted_by: openai_batch:gpt-5.5
extracted_at: '2026-04-28'
notes: |-
  No unsupported taxonomy symbol references were assigned; available symbol list did not include harvest, gulf, kiss, or embrace.
  batch_run_id=motif-extraction-2026-04-28-high-priority
  custom_id=motif_extract:greek-plato-symposium-jowett-gutenberg__l835-l921
  passage_sha256=f02c17d768f38861e2b678cfd82826e470e06ff01ba50cf93a7740b213514516