Comparative mythology corpus

batch.motif.islamic-koran-sale-gutenberg-l6617-l6669

batch.motif.islamic-koran-sale-gutenberg-l6617-l6669

---
record_id: batch.motif.islamic-koran-sale-gutenberg-l6617-l6669
source_text_path: texts/public-domain/islamic/project-gutenberg/koran-sale.md
passage_locator:
  label: SECTION V. / OF CERTAIN NEGATIVE PRECEPTS IN THE KORN. / SECTION VI. / OF
    THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE KORAN IN CIVIL AFFAIRS.; lines 6617-6669
  start: '6617'
  end: '6669'
  translation: The Koran (Al-Qur'an), Sale translation/commentary as represented in
    Project Gutenberg text
  notes: Generated from OpenAI Batch run motif-extraction-2026-04-28-high-priority;
    human review required.
canonical_text:
  quote: ''
  summary: The passage discusses legitimacy of children, rules for private contracts
    and debts, evidentiary requirements such as witnesses, writing, pledges, and oaths,
    and legal treatment of wilful murder and manslaughter, including fines, freeing
    captives, retaliation by next of kin, fasting as penance, and comparisons with
    Mosaic/Jewish law and Arab custom.
  language: English
  quote_policy: summarized
literal_observations:
- id: obs:1
  text: Children of legal wives are treated as legitimate; children of common women
    whose fathers are unknown are described as bastards.
  category: relationship
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:1
- id: obs:2
  text: Private contracts are recommended to be conscientiously performed and made
    before witnesses.
  category: action
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:2
- id: obs:3
  text: Unexecuted contracts and future debts are to be put in writing before at least
    two witnesses; if two men are unavailable, one man and two women may suffice.
  category: sequence
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:2
- id: obs:4
  text: Where no writer is available, pledges are to be taken for debts or contracts.
  category: object
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:2
- id: obs:5
  text: If parties rely on trust without writing, witnesses, or pledge, the defendant
    is acquitted if he denies the claim under oath unless contrary proof is very strong.
  category: action
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:3
- id: obs:6
  text: Wilful murder is described as forbidden by the Koran under severe penalties
    in the next life.
  category: action
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:4
- id: obs:7
  text: Wilful murder may be compounded for by paying a fine to the deceased's family
    and freeing a Moslem from captivity.
  category: action
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:5
- id: obs:8
  text: The next of kin, called the revenger of blood in the passage's comparison,
    may accept satisfaction or require that the murderer be delivered for death.
  category: relationship
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:5
- id: obs:9
  text: The passage says Mosaic law forbids taking satisfaction for a murderer's life,
    while Arab custom is described as tending toward severe revenge and tribal warfare.
  category: other
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:6
- id: obs:10
  text: Unintentional killing must be redeemed by fine and freeing a captive, unless
    the next of kin remits the fine; inability to do this requires fasting two consecutive
    months as penance.
  category: sequence
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:7
- id: obs:11
  text: The blood-fine is given as one hundred camels in the Sonna and is distributed
    among the deceased's relations according to inheritance laws.
  category: object
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:8
- id: obs:12
  text: If the slain person is from an enemy or non-confederate group, the slayer
    is not bound to pay a fine, and freeing a captive is sufficient.
  category: relationship
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:8
figures:
- id: fig:1
  name_or_label: legal wives and their children
  description: Wives described as legal and ingenuous, whose children are not counted
    as bastards.
  role_refs:
  - role:1
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:1
- id: fig:2
  name_or_label: common women and children of unknown fathers
  description: Women and children used to define the exception to legitimacy in the
    passage.
  role_refs:
  - role:2
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:1
- id: fig:3
  name_or_label: contracting parties
  description: Men engaged in private contracts or debts with one another.
  role_refs:
  - role:3
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:2
  - ev:3
- id: fig:4
  name_or_label: witnesses
  description: Required observers for contracts and written debt instruments; specified
    as two male Moslems, or one man and two women if two men cannot be obtained.
  role_refs:
  - role:4
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:2
- id: fig:5
  name_or_label: writer
  description: A person who writes down contracts or debts when they are not immediately
    executed.
  role_refs:
  - role:5
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:2
- id: fig:6
  name_or_label: defendant or debtor under oath
  description: The party against whom a demand is made and who may be acquitted if
    denying the charge on oath without contrary proof.
  role_refs:
  - role:6
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:3
- id: fig:7
  name_or_label: murderer or slayer
  description: Person responsible for wilful murder or undesigned killing.
  role_refs:
  - role:7
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:4
  - ev:5
  - ev:7
  - ev:8
- id: fig:8
  name_or_label: deceased or slain person
  description: Victim whose family or relations may receive fine or decide whether
    to remit it.
  role_refs:
  - role:8
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:5
  - ev:7
  - ev:8
- id: fig:9
  name_or_label: family, relations, or next of kin of the deceased
  description: Recipients of fines and holders of the choice to accept satisfaction,
    remit a fine, or require retaliation.
  role_refs:
  - role:9
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:5
  - ev:7
  - ev:8
- id: fig:10
  name_or_label: captive
  description: A Moslem or captive whose freeing forms part of the penalty or redemption
    for killing.
  role_refs:
  - role:10
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:5
  - ev:7
  - ev:8
- id: fig:11
  name_or_label: Mohammed
  description: Named in the passage as having diverged from the Mosaic law in allowing
    composition for murder, according to the commentator.
  role_refs:
  - role:11
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:6
- id: fig:12
  name_or_label: Arabs in Mohammed's time
  description: Described as having customs of vindictive revenge that could involve
    whole tribes in bloody wars.
  role_refs:
  - role:12
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:6
roles:
- id: role:1
  label: legitimate family members
  assigned_to:
  - fig:1
  basis: Children born of legal wives are not accounted bastards.
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:1
- id: role:2
  label: exception to legitimacy rule
  assigned_to:
  - fig:2
  basis: Children of common women whose fathers are unknown are the stated exception.
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:1
- id: role:3
  label: obligated contract parties
  assigned_to:
  - fig:3
  basis: Private contracts between persons are to be performed and secured.
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:2
  - ev:3
- id: role:4
  label: legal witnesses
  assigned_to:
  - fig:4
  basis: Contracts and debts are directed to be made or written in the presence of
    witnesses.
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:2
- id: role:5
  label: contract scribe
  assigned_to:
  - fig:5
  basis: A writer is assumed for reducing contracts into writing; pledges substitute
    when no writer is found.
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:2
- id: role:6
  label: oath-denying defendant
  assigned_to:
  - fig:6
  basis: The party demanded from is acquitted if he denies the debt on oath absent
    convincing contrary proof.
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:3
- id: role:7
  label: killer subject to penalty
  assigned_to:
  - fig:7
  basis: Murderers and unintentional slayers are subject to specified penalties or
    retaliation.
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:4
  - ev:5
  - ev:7
  - ev:8
- id: role:8
  label: victim of killing
  assigned_to:
  - fig:8
  basis: The deceased or slain person anchors the fine and kinship claims.
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:5
  - ev:7
  - ev:8
- id: role:9
  label: blood-kin decision maker
  assigned_to:
  - fig:9
  basis: The next of kin may accept satisfaction, require retaliation, or remit a
    manslaughter fine.
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:5
  - ev:7
- id: role:10
  label: person liberated as penalty or redemption
  assigned_to:
  - fig:10
  basis: Freeing a captive is repeatedly listed as part or all of the penalty for
    killing.
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:5
  - ev:7
  - ev:8
- id: role:11
  label: legal founder as described by commentator
  assigned_to:
  - fig:11
  basis: The passage attributes to Mohammed a departure from Mosaic law regarding
    satisfaction for murder.
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:6
- id: role:12
  label: customary revenge group
  assigned_to:
  - fig:12
  basis: The passage describes Arab vindictive customs and tribal wars over murder.
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:6
symbols:
- id: sym:1
  label: written contract
  literal_form: contract reduced into writing
  associated_figures:
  - fig:3
  - fig:5
  taxonomy_refs: []
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:2
- id: sym:2
  label: two witnesses
  literal_form: two male Moslem witnesses, or one man and two women
  associated_figures:
  - fig:4
  taxonomy_refs: []
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:2
- id: sym:3
  label: pledge
  literal_form: pledge taken when no writer is available
  associated_figures:
  - fig:3
  taxonomy_refs: []
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:2
- id: sym:4
  label: oath of denial
  literal_form: denial on oath that the defendant owes nothing
  associated_figures:
  - fig:6
  taxonomy_refs: []
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:3
- id: sym:5
  label: blood-fine
  literal_form: fine for a man's blood, specified as one hundred camels in the Sonna
  associated_figures:
  - fig:7
  - fig:8
  - fig:9
  taxonomy_refs: []
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:5
  - ev:8
- id: sym:6
  label: freeing a captive
  literal_form: release of a Moslem or captive as part of penalty or redemption
  associated_figures:
  - fig:7
  - fig:10
  taxonomy_refs: []
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:5
  - ev:7
  - ev:8
- id: sym:7
  label: two-month fast
  literal_form: fasting two months together as penance
  associated_figures:
  - fig:7
  taxonomy_refs: []
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:7
- id: sym:8
  label: next-life penalty
  literal_form: severe penalties in the next life for wilful murder
  associated_figures:
  - fig:7
  taxonomy_refs: []
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:4
scenes:
- id: scene:1
  label: Securing contracts and debts
  summary: Private contracts and future debts are to be performed, witnessed, written
    when not immediately executed, and supported by pledges when no writer is available.
  figure_refs:
  - fig:3
  - fig:4
  - fig:5
  symbol_refs:
  - sym:1
  - sym:2
  - sym:3
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:2
- id: scene:2
  label: Oath in absence of written proof
  summary: When parties trust one another without written evidence, witnesses, or
    pledges, a defendant may be acquitted by denying the demand under oath unless
    contrary proof is strong.
  figure_refs:
  - fig:3
  - fig:6
  symbol_refs:
  - sym:4
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:3
- id: scene:3
  label: Wilful murder, compensation, and retaliation
  summary: Wilful murder is forbidden with next-life penalties, but may be settled
    by fine and freeing a captive unless the next of kin insists on the murderer's
    death.
  figure_refs:
  - fig:7
  - fig:8
  - fig:9
  - fig:10
  symbol_refs:
  - sym:5
  - sym:6
  - sym:8
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:4
  - ev:5
- id: scene:4
  label: Manslaughter redemption and penance
  summary: Unintentional killing is redeemed by fine and freeing a captive, or by
    two months of fasting if the slayer cannot perform the required compensation.
  figure_refs:
  - fig:7
  - fig:8
  - fig:9
  - fig:10
  symbol_refs:
  - sym:5
  - sym:6
  - sym:7
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:7
  - ev:8
- id: scene:5
  label: Comparison with Mosaic law and Arab custom
  summary: The commentator contrasts the homicide rules with Mosaic prohibition of
    satisfaction for murder and connects them to Arab customs of blood revenge and
    tribal conflict.
  figure_refs:
  - fig:7
  - fig:11
  - fig:12
  symbol_refs:
  - sym:5
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:6
candidate_motifs:
- id: motif:1
  label: witnessed and written obligation
  taxonomy_refs: []
  basis: Contracts and future debts are secured by witnesses, writing, and pledges.
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:2
  confidence: high
  cautions: This is a legal-institutional pattern rather than a mythic narrative motif.
- id: motif:2
  label: oath as decisive proof when material evidence is absent
  taxonomy_refs: []
  basis: A demanded party may be acquitted by oath-denial unless strong contrary evidence
    is produced.
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:3
  confidence: high
  cautions: The passage treats the oath as legal procedure; it does not elaborate
    a ritual or mythic scene.
- id: motif:3
  label: blood compensation replacing or competing with retaliation
  taxonomy_refs: []
  basis: The murderer may be settled for by fine and freeing a captive, but next of
    kin may refuse and seek the murderer's death.
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:5
  confidence: high
  cautions: The motif is extracted as a comparative legal pattern, not as a narrative
    episode.
- id: motif:4
  label: expiation for killing through payment, liberation, or fasting
  taxonomy_refs: []
  basis: Manslaughter is redeemed by fine and freeing a captive; if unable, the slayer
    fasts two months as penance.
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:7
  - ev:8
  confidence: high
  cautions: The passage gives prescriptive law; symbolic interpretation of the acts
    should be reviewed.
- id: motif:5
  label: posthumous divine penalty for murder
  taxonomy_refs:
  - divine_judgment
  basis: Wilful murder is said to be forbidden under severe penalties in the next
    life.
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:4
  confidence: medium
  cautions: Only a brief doctrinal reference appears; no afterlife scene is narrated.
comparison_claims:
- id: claim:1
  claim: The passage explicitly compares Islamic evidentiary practice for contracts
    with Jewish legal witness requirements, noting a similar requirement even outside
    capital cases.
  claim_level: same_function
  target: Jewish legal witness practice cited through Deuteronomy and New Testament
    references
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:9
  counter_evidence_refs: []
  confidence: medium
  limitations: The comparison appears in a footnote/commentarial apparatus, not as
    a narrative claim within the Koranic text itself.
- id: claim:2
  claim: The passage contrasts Islamic composition for murder with Mosaic law, which
    it says forbids accepting satisfaction for the life of a murderer.
  claim_level: same_function
  target: Mosaic law on homicide compensation, cited as Numbers xxxv. 31
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:6
  counter_evidence_refs: []
  confidence: high
  limitations: The claim is primarily a contrast within a shared legal problem; it
    should not be read as evidence of identical doctrine.
- id: claim:3
  claim: The passage suggests that the homicide-compensation rule responded to Arab
    customs of blood revenge and tribal warfare.
  claim_level: historical_contact
  target: Arab customary blood revenge in Mohammed's time
  evidence_refs:
  - ev:6
  counter_evidence_refs: []
  confidence: medium
  limitations: This is the translator/commentator's historical explanation and requires
    external historical review before being treated as established influence.
evidence:
- id: ev:1
  type: summary
  locator: lines 6617-6618
  quote_or_summary: Children of legal wives are legitimate; only children of common
    women with unknown fathers are counted as bastards.
  source_text_path: texts/public-domain/islamic/project-gutenberg/koran-sale.md
  rights_note: Public domain source text; summarized.
- id: ev:2
  type: summary
  locator: lines 6619-6629
  quote_or_summary: Contracts are recommended to be performed, witnessed, written
    when not immediately executed, and secured by pledges if no writer is available;
    witness numbers and gender are specified.
  source_text_path: texts/public-domain/islamic/project-gutenberg/koran-sale.md
  rights_note: Public domain source text; summarized.
- id: ev:3
  type: summary
  locator: lines 6629-6634
  quote_or_summary: If parties trust one another without writing, witnesses, or pledge,
    the demanded party is acquitted by denying the claim on oath unless convincing
    contrary circumstances prove otherwise.
  source_text_path: texts/public-domain/islamic/project-gutenberg/koran-sale.md
  rights_note: Public domain source text; summarized.
- id: ev:4
  type: quote
  locator: lines 6635-6637
  quote_or_summary: '"Wilful murder" is forbidden "under the severest penalties to
    be inflicted in the next life."'
  source_text_path: texts/public-domain/islamic/project-gutenberg/koran-sale.md
  rights_note: Public domain source text; short quotation.
- id: ev:5
  type: summary
  locator: lines 6635-6643
  quote_or_summary: Wilful murder may be compounded by a fine to the deceased's family
    and freeing a Moslem from captivity; the next of kin may accept satisfaction or
    demand the murderer's death.
  source_text_path: texts/public-domain/islamic/project-gutenberg/koran-sale.md
  rights_note: Public domain source text; summarized.
- id: ev:6
  type: summary
  locator: lines 6643-6651
  quote_or_summary: The commentator says Mohammed diverged from Mosaic law forbidding
    satisfaction for murder and connects the rule to Arab customs of revenge that
    could involve tribes in bloody wars.
  source_text_path: texts/public-domain/islamic/project-gutenberg/koran-sale.md
  rights_note: Public domain source text; summarized.
- id: ev:7
  type: summary
  locator: lines 6652-6658
  quote_or_summary: Manslaughter is redeemed by fine and freeing a captive unless
    remitted by next of kin; inability to perform this requires fasting two consecutive
    months as penance.
  source_text_path: texts/public-domain/islamic/project-gutenberg/koran-sale.md
  rights_note: Public domain source text; summarized.
- id: ev:8
  type: summary
  locator: lines 6658-6665
  quote_or_summary: The fine for a man's blood is a hundred camels and distributed
    among the deceased's relations; if the slain is an enemy or non-confederate, freeing
    a captive is sufficient.
  source_text_path: texts/public-domain/islamic/project-gutenberg/koran-sale.md
  rights_note: Public domain source text; summarized.
- id: ev:9
  type: summary
  locator: lines 6667-6669 and note 3
  quote_or_summary: A note says the same witness requirement appears to have been
    required by Jewish law, citing Deuteronomy and New Testament passages.
  source_text_path: texts/public-domain/islamic/project-gutenberg/koran-sale.md
  rights_note: Public domain source text; summarized.
confidence:
  extraction: high
  motif_candidates: medium
  comparison_claims: medium
  notes: Legal prescriptions are explicit. Motif labels are cautious because the passage
    is expository legal commentary rather than mythic narrative. Comparison claims
    are limited to comparisons made within the supplied passage and notes.
reviewer_status:
  status: needs_review
  reviewer: ''
  reviewed_at: ''
  notes: Machine-generated draft from OpenAI Batch; not human-reviewed.
extracted_by: openai_batch:gpt-5.5
extracted_at: '2026-04-28'
notes: |-
  No external sources were used. Taxonomy references are limited to the supplied list; only divine_judgment was applied, and only for the brief next-life penalty reference.
  batch_run_id=motif-extraction-2026-04-28-high-priority
  custom_id=motif_extract:islamic-koran-sale-gutenberg__l6617-l6669
  passage_sha256=8beaed3d817e62d14eff4509977ac01f3d889f3772477903b69eb491a2a565b0